Plan before code
We write down goals, risks, and user value before agent flows implement.
Caire builds an AI-first healthcare platform, but with senior product discipline: small verified changes, clear owners, human review, and respect for real home care.

The same principle used in Caire Core applies internally: a continuous learning loop, clear decisions, traceability, and human responsibility before automation.
We write down goals, risks, and user value before agent flows implement.
AI can produce a lot, but code, design, content, and data flows are reviewed as product work.
Technology is judged against real home-care work: planners, caregivers, clients, and family.
We prefer useful improvements that can be tested, measured, and improved over large opaque leaps.
Delivery mandate
Product owners write a PRD with change, success metric, and non-goals. Specialized agents then handle Spec, tests, implementation, review, verification, dossier, and PR flow while humans stay accountable for the product decision.
North star
We measure the elapsed time from PRD intake to merged PR, model spend per shipped feature, and token efficiency. The point is not replacing product judgment; it is removing avoidable handoffs from work that has already been specified.
Workflow
Each stage produces a checked artifact. The next stage refuses to start without it, making the pipeline a one-way contract from product intent to merged change.
| # | Stage | Output | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Intake normalize | Canonical PRD path and feature slug | Orchestrator |
| 1 | PRD | Change, success metric, non-goals | Human |
| 2 | Spec | Gherkin acceptance scenarios | Architect agent |
| 3 | Tests | Failing Vitest and Playwright tests | Test-writer |
| 4 | Implementation | Code in an isolated worktree | Editor |
| 5 | Review | P1/P2/P3 findings or clean report | Reviewer agents |
| 6 | Verification | Trace, screenshot, summary dossier | Verifier |
| 7 | PR | Pushed branch and external review | GitHub flow |
Migrated platform source
The old platform documentation had separate subpages for each agentic workflow concept. Those pages are now folded into this Brand 2.0 careers page so candidates and partners can understand the system without leaving the main website.
The job is to shorten the path from product intent to verified change without removing accountability. Read this first: humans own priority, quality, and decisions.
The workflow splits responsibility across Architect, Editor, Reviewer, Verifier, and Orchestrator. The role chooses the model by task, cost, risk, and context.
Darwin is a thin in-house Node loop that holds intake, queue, status, and evidence together. It should stay simple, observable, and replaceable in parts.
The component map separates what is used by the PRD-to-PR pipeline, what is parked, and what remains in the prioritized build queue.
The adapter shape lets the workflow select a model without locking the product process to one vendor or one interface.
Spec means testable acceptance scenarios, not loose wishes. Gherkin and a done contract gate reduce spec drift between PRD, tests, and implementation.
The review loop polls external reviewers, classifies severity, and re-enters the editor with an idempotent action list.
Automation should scale only when evidence, cost, and quality hold. Otherwise it must be easy to stop or roll back.
The features per second per token metric is read together with cost, quality, and business signals to see whether the workflow actually improves delivery.
Every delivery should leave a trace: trace.zip, screenshot.png, console.log, test excerpts, and a short explanation of what the artifact proves.
The product we build and the way we build it share a philosophy: trace what changed, learn from outcomes, and keep humans accountable for decisions that matter.