Fields and resources

    Solutions

    One comparable solution frontier for a schedule: Standing data, Coverage, and N Efficiency rungs.

    Insikter breaks the reconciliation down by visit, employee, client, visit group, and area.

    Solutions

    Guide

    See how to review and compare Standing data, Coverage, and Efficiency after the same launch.

    1. 1. Read the status and quick metrics on each frontier level.
    2. 2. Read the Pareto trade-off.
    3. 3. Open the calendar and diagnostics for a selected option.
    4. 4. Investigate a coverage gap before publishing.

    Insikter breaks the reconciliation down by visit, employee, client, visit group, and area.

    Fields and use

    FieldLevelWhy it mattersUsed for
    Result statusFirst scheduleShows whether the option is complete or complete with a coverage gap.A coverage gap can be compared and diagnosed but cannot be published.
    Card quick metricsBetter metricsShows unassigned visits, client time of paid time, paid time without visits, blocked matching, missing capacity, and fixed/flex shifts.A quick check of each option before opening the broader comparison.
    Read the solution frontierBetter metricsShows the trade-off between visit assignment, time composition, quality profile, and detailed solution metrics.Choosing what to review next in the calendar and diagnostics.

    Where it appears

    Insikter breaks the reconciliation down by visit, employee, client, visit group, and area.
    Insikter breaks the reconciliation down by visit, employee, client, visit group, and area.
    Illustrative Pareto frontier in a synthetic demo example: coverage and efficiency are a visible trade-off, not a customer result.
    Illustrative Pareto frontier in a synthetic demo example: coverage and efficiency are a visible trade-off, not a customer result.