Human-in-the-loop
AI creates candidates, but responsible planners review, adjust, and approve before a schedule is published.
Caire builds AI as decision support for planning, not autonomous public authority decisions. Recommendations should be transparent, planner-approved, and reviewable after the fact.

Current page
AI compliance
Human-in-the-loop, AI governance, and review trails.
Responsible AI
Caire Core collects recommendations, user decisions, and outcomes in a continuous learning loop where improvements are reviewed by responsible users before they affect production.
AI creates candidates, but responsible planners review, adjust, and approve before a schedule is published.
Users should understand why a recommendation appears, which goals it affects, and what trade-offs it creates.
Recommendations, changes, and decisions are saved as operational traces for follow-up and internal control.
AI is used for planning and operational support with clear boundaries, responsibilities, and escalation paths.
Caire treats AI scheduling as operational decision support. The EU AI Act is considered through transparency, documented scope, human oversight, and risk-aware controls rather than unverified certification claims.
Recommendations are tied to configured goals and constraints such as travel time, continuity, skills, and time windows. Users can review why a candidate schedule was generated before publishing.
Human planners remain responsible for final review. They can override recommendations, compare alternatives, and approve the published schedule.
Customer operating data is handled for the organization’s workflow. Caire does not position public scheduling optimization as hidden generative-model training on customer records.
The same architecture that optimizes schedules also records the goals, constraints, and user choices around each recommendation.
The product is designed to help organizations explain data sources, human oversight, evaluation routines, and operational controls when they document their AI use.